Urban Phytoarchitecture Design Options: Greenspace Orientation and Tree Species Intensification

Authors

  • Tarranita Kusumadewi Environmental Studies, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8290-2451
  • Maryunani Faculty of Economics, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
  • Surjono Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
  • Yunifa Miftahul Arif Department of Informatics Engineering, State Islamic University of Malang, Malang, Indonesia
  • Harida Samudro Department of Architecture, State Islamic University of Malang, Malang, Indonesia
  • Ganjar Samudro Department of Environmental Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Sarwoko Mangkoedihardjo Department of Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.31.1.183196

Keywords:

Air quality, biodiversity, carbon dioxide, natural resources, sustainable cities

Abstract

This paper discussed a new perspective on the path of sunlight as a basis for urban phytoarchitecture design, which empowers the ability of plants to absorb carbon dioxide and simultaneously lowers the surface temperature. The aim was to provide options for intensifying greenspace orientation and plant types as one of the goals of a sustainable city. This research analysed previous research sources collected from the reference management platform. The literature selection uses the keywords greenspace, orientation, carbon dioxide, and surface warming, all of which are the latest publications. The result for the first option was the orientation of the greenspace following the path of sunlight. For urban infrastructure in a North-South direction, it was advisable to intensify greenspace by planting trees that absorb large amounts of carbon dioxide. In addition, it was recommended to apply biodiversity to enhance the absorption of the gas. For East-West oriented infrastructure sites, intensifying greenspace with sunshade trees was the right choice, and biodiversity was not a limiting factor because it does not support leaf area growth. While the first option cannot be followed due to existing field conditions, the second option is intensifying tree species with biodiversity, which can absorb carbon dioxide and reduce surface warming.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Tarranita Kusumadewi, Environmental Studies, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

tarra.nita@arch.uin-malang.ac.id

Maryunani, Faculty of Economics, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

maryunani200216@yahoo.com

Surjono, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

surjono@ub.ac.id

Yunifa Miftahul Arif, Department of Informatics Engineering, State Islamic University of Malang, Malang, Indonesia

yunif4@ti.uin-malang.ac.id

Harida Samudro, Department of Architecture, State Islamic University of Malang, Malang, Indonesia

haridasamudro@arch.uin-malang.ac.id

Ganjar Samudro, Department of Environmental Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

ganjarsamudro@live.undip.ac.id

Sarwoko Mangkoedihardjo, Department of Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia

prosarwoko@gmail.com

Published

2023-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles