Analysis of Student Activities Based on Log Files in E-Learning using Clustering Algorithm

Authors

  • Indra Maulana Graduate Program in Technology and Vocational Education, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
  • Metta Mariam Graduate Program in Technology and Vocational Education, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.53.1.115

Keywords:

E-learning, Log files, MOOC

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyse log data generated by e-learning platforms such as Moodle or similar platforms. The main objective of this research is to identify patterns and insights that can help improve the student learning experience and the efficiency of platform management. This study identifies the most effective clustering algorithms for grouping students based on their behaviour and achievements in the e-learning environment, namely K-means and K-Medoids. The methods used to determine the optimal number of clusters are the Silhouette Coefficient method and the Elbow method, utilizing both methods to determine the best clustering algorithm results. Based on the analysis using K-means and K-Medoids clustering methods on the log data of the programming algorithm course, the total number of action logs over a one-month period is 95,461, with an average of 892 action logs per participant. The distribution of action logs based on class (A, B, and C) shows variation in the number and average of action logs per class. Types of activities such as assignments, forums, video views, and course views have different average frequencies, with video views being the most frequently visited activity. Pearson correlations between activity types show strong relationships between activities, with the highest correlation between visits and course views. The optimal number of clusters based on the Elbow and K-Medoids methods is three clusters. Cluster 3 in K-Means has the best performance with the smallest DBI value (0.424) and the smallest centroid distance (21,168.534).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Indra Maulana, Graduate Program in Technology and Vocational Education, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia

Indramaulana.2021@student.uny.ac.id

Metta Mariam, Graduate Program in Technology and Vocational Education, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia

mettamariam.2021@student.uny.ac.id

Published

2024-09-21

Issue

Section

Articles