Systematic Review of Risks in Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) Projects

Authors

  • Zamri Zakaria Fakulti Teknologi dan Kejuruteraan Elektrik, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Jalan Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia
  • Md Nazri Othman Fakulti Teknologi dan Kejuruteraan Elektrik, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Jalan Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia
  • Hidayat Zainuddin Fakulti Teknologi dan Kejuruteraan Elektrik, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Jalan Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia
  • Mohd Jahidi Rosdi Jabatan Kejuruteraan Elektrik, Politeknik Port Dickson, Km 14, Jalan Pantai, 71050 Si Rusa, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
  • Alaa Razzaq Khallawi General Company of Electricity, Transmission, Ministry of Electricity, Republic of Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.48.2.235250

Keywords:

Energy performance contracting, risks in EPC projects, risk factors and categories

Abstract

In recent years, the market trends and acceptance of Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) have caught the attention of international specialists, especially in energy management fields. EPC projects are widely acknowledged as among the most efficient global strategies for improving Energy Efficiency (EE). However, EPC projects are plagued by numerous uncertainties, which increase project risk. The impact of risk factors and categories on EPC projects can influence the effectiveness and success of implementation in EPC projects. This paper applied the pre-recording systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) approach to determine the primary data based on a few keywords, such as “risk or uncertainty and Energy Performance Contracting or Energy Performance Contracting project”. Based on advanced searching on SCOPUS and Web of Science (WOS), we found 32 selected articles (n=32). Expert scholars decided to develop three themes, which are (1) risk categories in EPC projects, (2) risk factors and categories in EPC projects, as well as (3) risk assessment methods in EPC projects. Here, the results summarise that the 19 risk factors were obtained and classified into six categories. In addition, risk assessment methods in EPC projects have been summarised. Consequently, the research findings can benefit academics and industrial practitioners in EPC projects.

Author Biographies

Zamri Zakaria, Fakulti Teknologi dan Kejuruteraan Elektrik, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Jalan Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia

zamri.jkeppd@gmail.com

Md Nazri Othman, Fakulti Teknologi dan Kejuruteraan Elektrik, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Jalan Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia

nazri@utem.edu.my

Hidayat Zainuddin, Fakulti Teknologi dan Kejuruteraan Elektrik, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Jalan Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia

hidayat@utem.edu.my

Mohd Jahidi Rosdi, Jabatan Kejuruteraan Elektrik, Politeknik Port Dickson, Km 14, Jalan Pantai, 71050 Si Rusa, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

Jahidi@polipd.edu.my

Alaa Razzaq Khallawi, General Company of Electricity, Transmission, Ministry of Electricity, Republic of Iraq

Alaautem9000@gmail.com

Downloads

Published

2024-07-18

How to Cite

Zamri Zakaria, Md Nazri Othman, Hidayat Zainuddin, Mohd Jahidi Rosdi, & Alaa Razzaq Khallawi. (2024). Systematic Review of Risks in Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) Projects . Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 48(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.48.2.235250

Issue

Section

Articles