Reduce PAPR in Filtered-CPOFDM using Hybrid Method System

Authors

  • Azlan Yusof Wireless Communication Technology Group (WiCOT), School of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Ezmin Abdullah Wireless Communication Technology Group (WiCOT), School of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Azlina Idris Wireless Communication Technology Group (WiCOT), School of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Wan Azani Mustafa Faculty of Electrical Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, UniCITI Alam Campus, Sungai ChuChuh, 02100 Padang Besar, Perlis, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.49.2.6474

Keywords:

Filtered Cyclic Prefix Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (F-CPOFDM), Selected:Group Codeword Shift (GCS), Selective Codeword Shift (SCS), Median Codeword Shift (MCS), Walsh Hadamard Transform (WHT), Peak-to-Average Power Ratio (PAPR)

Abstract

5G multicarrier waveform Filtered Cyclic Prefix Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (F-CPOFDM) allows for high data speeds and increases in spectrum efficiency. The main drawback of F-CPOFDM is its high peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR), a common element of all multicarrier modulation schemes. In this research is investigate the implementation of a Hybrid strategy to reduce the peak to average power ratio (PAPR) in a F-CPOFDM system and evaluated the impact of employing a Hybrid Technique with Group Codeword Shift (GCS), Median Codeword Shift, Selective Codeword Shift (SCS), and Conventional F-CPOFDM on the reduction of peak to average power ratio (PAPR) in CP-OFDM. The novelty of this research is GCS method integration with WHT Precoding technique for reduce PAPR. Simulation results show that compared to traditional Filtered-CPOFDM, the GCS-WHT method reduces peak PAPR by 59.46 %, while the SCS- method reduces it by 32.43 % and the MCS-WHT method reduces it by 31.53%. Compare to the non-hybrid technique, the GCS only reduce 45.95%, while for SCS and MCS reduce 19.82% and 23.42% respectively. From the results, shows that Hybrid method is better performance compare with non-hybrid method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Azlan Yusof, Wireless Communication Technology Group (WiCOT), School of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

azlanyusof.2021@gmail.com

Ezmin Abdullah, Wireless Communication Technology Group (WiCOT), School of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

ezmin@uitm.edu.my

Azlina Idris, Wireless Communication Technology Group (WiCOT), School of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

azlina831@uitm.edu.my

Wan Azani Mustafa, Faculty of Electrical Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, UniCITI Alam Campus, Sungai ChuChuh, 02100 Padang Besar, Perlis, Malaysia

wanazani@unimap.edu.my

Published

2024-08-05

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>