Cost And Product Optimization of Upgrading Light Naphtha Using Pressure Swing Adsorption Method by Aspen Adsorption Simulation

Authors

  • Rendra Panca Anugraha Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111 Indonesia
  • Renanto Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111 Indonesia
  • Rifky Arya Maulana Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111 Indonesia
  • Rasyid Dito Kusumo Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111 Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.100.2.198210

Keywords:

Adsorption, economic potential, naphtha, Pressure Swing Adsorption, RON, simulation

Abstract

Light naphtha is an organic compound produced from the distillation process that is often sold at a low price because of its poor performance, especially in the value of Research Octane Number (RON). The goal of this study was to improve the quality of naphtha to become a useful fuel with qualifying performance that is High Optimum Mogas Component (HOMC) by using the Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) method with the help of Aspen Adsorption simulations to find the most optimal combination of zeolite adsorbents (Beta and 5A) to use in the process. The principle of this quality improvement is to separate the compounds contained in naphtha that have low RON values from those that have high RON values so that the performance of naphtha that has gone through the adsorption process can be maximized. For this study, the RON target from HOMC is 95, while the value of RON for feed light naphtha ranges from 61-65. There are three compounds simulated in this PSA process, n-pentane and n-hexane as compounds that want to be separated because they have low RON values from iso-pentane which has a high RON value. Furthermore, after acquiring the combination of adsorbents that resulted in the products that have the highest RON, the economic potential of all variables was evaluated to get the most optimal process to use. The economic potential is also analyzed to find the profit of the PSA process. The most optimal results are obtained when the adsorbent configuration produces the product with the highest RON and produces high economic potential. The results showed that the most optimal adsorbent combination is to use 30% Zeolite Beta; 70% Zeolite 5A with product results having the highest RON of 84 and economic potential of US$ 114,410,163.92.

Author Biographies

Rendra Panca Anugraha, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111 Indonesia

rendra@its.ac.id

Renanto, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111 Indonesia

renanto@chem-eng.its.ac.id

Rifky Arya Maulana, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111 Indonesia

rifky.arya10@gmail.com

Rasyid Dito Kusumo, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111 Indonesia

rasyid.ditok@gmail.com

Downloads

Published

2022-10-28

How to Cite

Rendra Panca Anugraha, Renanto, Rifky Arya Maulana, & Rasyid Dito Kusumo. (2022). Cost And Product Optimization of Upgrading Light Naphtha Using Pressure Swing Adsorption Method by Aspen Adsorption Simulation. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 100(2), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.100.2.198210

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)