Hanning’s Performance in 4253HT Smoother on Four Signals of Different Noise Levels

Authors

  • Adie Safian Ton Mohamed College of Computing, Informatics and Media, Universiti Teknologi MARA Jengka Campus Pahang Branch, 26400 Bandar Tun Razak, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Noor Izyan Mohamad Adnan College of Computing, Informatics and Media, Universiti Teknologi MARA Jengka Campus Pahang Branch, 26400 Bandar Tun Razak, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Fadila Amira Razali College of Computing, Informatics and Media, Universiti Teknologi MARA Jengka Campus Pahang Branch, 26400 Bandar Tun Razak, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Sharifah Norhuda Syed Wahid College of Computing, Informatics and Media, Universiti Teknologi MARA Jengka Campus Pahang Branch, 26400 Bandar Tun Razak, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Qasim Nasir Husain Department of Mathematics, College of Education for Pure Science, Tikrit University, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.44.2.260271

Keywords:

4253HT smoother, Hanning, Smoothing

Abstract

Smoothing is a method of data analysis that aims to provide well-defined patterns or signals by removing noise or unstructured patterns from data sets. To obtain clean and smooth data, Hanning is applied as one of the important components in smoothing. However, Hanning is not resistant to outliers. Therefore, this study aims to determine the best type of Hanning that is able to obtain the greatest performance of 4253HT smoother in signal recovery. Functions of Linear, Complex Sinusoidal, Custom Pulse Train, and Sawtooth signals corrupted with five levels of contaminated normal noise were used as signals in the smoothing process. All signals were applied to assess three different Hanning types, which were Tukey, Husain and Shitan. Besides, a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) was used as an evaluator to determine and assess the performance of 4253HT smoother when utilizing an alternative Hanning. Based on the overall performance of 4253HT smoother, Husain Hanning presented the best outcome and worked most efficiently at all levels of noise except at the lowest noise (10%), which Tukey Hanning executed better. The findings of this study could benefit other researchers to decide the best Hanning to be used before performing forecasting and further analysis to improve the accuracy of predicting.

Author Biographies

Adie Safian Ton Mohamed, College of Computing, Informatics and Media, Universiti Teknologi MARA Jengka Campus Pahang Branch, 26400 Bandar Tun Razak, Pahang, Malaysia

adiesafian@uitm.edu.my

Noor Izyan Mohamad Adnan, College of Computing, Informatics and Media, Universiti Teknologi MARA Jengka Campus Pahang Branch, 26400 Bandar Tun Razak, Pahang, Malaysia

noorizyan@uitm.edu.my

Fadila Amira Razali, College of Computing, Informatics and Media, Universiti Teknologi MARA Jengka Campus Pahang Branch, 26400 Bandar Tun Razak, Pahang, Malaysia

fadila962@uitm.edu.my

Sharifah Norhuda Syed Wahid, College of Computing, Informatics and Media, Universiti Teknologi MARA Jengka Campus Pahang Branch, 26400 Bandar Tun Razak, Pahang, Malaysia

sha_norhuda@uitm.edu.my

Qasim Nasir Husain, Department of Mathematics, College of Education for Pure Science, Tikrit University, Iraq

qasimalmojamee@gmail.com

Downloads

Published

2024-05-07

How to Cite

Adie Safian Ton Mohamed, Noor Izyan Mohamad Adnan, Fadila Amira Razali, Sharifah Norhuda Syed Wahid, & Qasim Nasir Husain. (2024). Hanning’s Performance in 4253HT Smoother on Four Signals of Different Noise Levels. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 44(2), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.44.2.260271

Issue

Section

Articles