Application of Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) in Gas Hydrate Mitigation

Authors

  • Sachin Dev Suresh Chemical Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, 32610, Perak, Malaysia
  • Ali Qasim CO2 Research Centre (CO2RES), Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, 32610, Perak, Malaysia
  • Bhajan Lal CO2 Research Centre (CO2RES), Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, 32610, Perak, Malaysia
  • Syed Muhammad Imran Department of Chemical Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Khor Siak Foo PTTEP, Level 26-30, Tower 2, Petronas Twin Towers, Kuala Lumpur City Centre, 50088, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.88.2.2737

Keywords:

Gas Hydrate, Gaussian Process Regression, Least Square Support Vector Machine, Artificial Neural Network, Average Depression Temperature

Abstract

The production of oil and natural gas contributes to a significant amount of revenue generation in Malaysia thereby strengthening the country’s economy. The flow assurance industry is faced with impediments during smooth operation of the transmission pipeline in which gas hydrate formation is the most important. It affects the normal operation of the pipeline by plugging it. Under high pressure and low temperature conditions, gas hydrate is a crystalline structure consisting of a network of hydrogen bonds between host molecules of water and guest molecules of the incoming gases. Industry uses different types of chemical inhibitors in pipeline to suppress hydrate formation. To overcome this problem, machine learning algorithm has been introduced as part of risk management strategies. The objective of this paper is to utilize Machine Learning (ML) model which is Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). GPR is a new approach being applied to mitigate the growth of gas hydrate. The input parameters used are concentration and pressure of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and Methane (CH4) gas hydrates whereas the output parameter is the Average Depression Temperature (ADT). The values for the parameter are taken from available data sets that enable GPR to predict the results accurately in terms of Coefficient of Determination, R2 and Mean Squared Error, MSE. The outcome from the research showed that GPR model provided with highest R2 value for training and testing data of 97.25% and 96.71%, respectively. MSE value for GPR was also found to be lowest for training and testing data of 0.019 and 0.023, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sachin Dev Suresh, Chemical Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, 32610, Perak, Malaysia

sachin.dev_24372@utp.edu.my

Ali Qasim, CO2 Research Centre (CO2RES), Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, 32610, Perak, Malaysia

aliqasimzohair@gmail.com

Bhajan Lal, CO2 Research Centre (CO2RES), Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, 32610, Perak, Malaysia

bhajan.lal@utp.edu.my

Syed Muhammad Imran, Department of Chemical Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore, Pakistan

imranhassan@cuilahore.edu.pk

Khor Siak Foo, PTTEP, Level 26-30, Tower 2, Petronas Twin Towers, Kuala Lumpur City Centre, 50088, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

khorsiakfoo88@gmail.com

Downloads

Published

2021-10-26

How to Cite

Sachin Dev Suresh, Ali Qasim, Bhajan Lal, Syed Muhammad Imran, & Khor Siak Foo. (2021). Application of Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) in Gas Hydrate Mitigation. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 88(2), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.88.2.2737

Issue

Section

Articles