Energy and Exergy Analysis of R600a as a Substitute for R134a in Automotive Air Conditioning System

Authors

  • Muhammad Arman Department of Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung 40012, Indonesia
  • Kasni Sumeru Department of Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung 40012, Indonesia
  • Andriyanto Setyawan Department of Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung 40012, Indonesia
  • Luga Martin Simbolon Department of Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung 40012, Indonesia
  • Mohamad Firdaus Sukri Faculty of Mechanical Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Durian Tunggal 76100 Melaka, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.119.1.105116

Keywords:

Energy analysis, exergy analysis, automotive A/C, R134a, R600a

Abstract

Until now, R134a is still used as a working fluid in automotive air conditioning (A/C) even though it has a very high global warming potential (GWP), which is 1430. Refrigerant R600a is an alternative working fluid as a substitute for R134a in automotive (A/C). This environmentally friendly substitute refrigerant is also expected to produce a better system performance, for which it is necessary to analyse energy and exergy. During work, each AC component generates friction, heat loss, and pressure drop which causes irreversibility in each component. The irreversible quantity of each component is calculated by exergy analysis. Because automotive A/C is driven by engine rotation, its performance is also affected by engine rotation. In this study, the engine rotation to be evaluated is 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, and 3000 rpm. The evaporating and condensing temperatures of automotive A/C in this study were 5oC and 45oC, respectively. Based on the energy analysis it was found that replacing R134a with R600 enhanced COP, for example at 2000 rpm for R134a and R600a respectively were 3.59 and 3.69, or an increase in COP of about 3%. Based on the exergy analysis, the greatest irreversibility occurred in the compressor, namely 72.1% and 78.6% for R134a and R600a, respectively, for 2000 rpm. This means that there is a potential to enhance the COP improvement using R600a by reducing the irreversibility on the compressor.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Arman, Department of Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung 40012, Indonesia

akangarman@polban.ac.id

Kasni Sumeru, Department of Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung 40012, Indonesia

sumeru@polban.ac.id

Andriyanto Setyawan, Department of Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung 40012, Indonesia

andriyanto@polban.ac.id

Luga Martin Simbolon, Department of Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung 40012, Indonesia

lugamartin@polban.ac.id

Mohamad Firdaus Sukri, Faculty of Mechanical Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Durian Tunggal 76100 Melaka, Malaysia

mohdfirdaus@utem.edu.my

Downloads

Published

2024-07-15

How to Cite

Muhammad Arman, Kasni Sumeru, Andriyanto Setyawan, Luga Martin Simbolon, & Mohamad Firdaus Sukri. (2024). Energy and Exergy Analysis of R600a as a Substitute for R134a in Automotive Air Conditioning System. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 119(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.119.1.105116

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)