Security Analysis on LUC-type Cryptosystems Using Common Modulus Attack

Authors

  • Izzatul Nabila Sarbini Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Tze Jin Wong Faculty of Humanities, Management and Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu Campus, 97008 Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Lee Feng Koo Faculty of Humanities, Management and Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu Campus, 97008 Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Ahmad Fadly Nurullah Rasedee Faculty of Economi and Mualamat, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
  • Fatin Hana Naning Faculty of Humanities, Management and Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu Campus, 97008 Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Mohammad Hasan Abdul Sathar Centre of Foundation Studies for Agricultural Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.29.3.206213

Keywords:

Common modulus, Decryption, Sncryption, Keys, Lucas sequence

Abstract

LUC-type cryptosystems are asymmetric key cryptosystems based on the Lucas sequence that is extended from RSA. The security challenge is comparable to RSA, which is based on the intractability of factoring a large number. This paper analysed the security of LUC, LUC3, and LUC4,6 cryptosystems using a common modulus attack. For a common modulus attack to be successful, a message must be transmitted to two distinct receivers with the same modulus. The strengths and limitations of the LUC, LUC3, and LUC4,6 cryptosystems when subjected to a common modulus attack were discussed as well. The results reveal that the LUC4,6 cryptosystem provides greater security than the LUC and LUC3.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Izzatul Nabila Sarbini, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia

sinabila@unimas.my

Tze Jin Wong, Faculty of Humanities, Management and Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu Campus, 97008 Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia

w.tzejin@upm.edu.my

Lee Feng Koo, Faculty of Humanities, Management and Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu Campus, 97008 Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia

leefeng@upm.edu.my

Ahmad Fadly Nurullah Rasedee, Faculty of Economi and Mualamat, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

fadlynurullah@usim.edu.my

Fatin Hana Naning, Faculty of Humanities, Management and Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu Campus, 97008 Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia

fatinhanaz@upm.edu.my

Mohammad Hasan Abdul Sathar, Centre of Foundation Studies for Agricultural Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

mohdhasan@upm.edu.my

Published

2023-02-18

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)