Impact on Reconstruction SPECT Image Distortion by Iteration and Subset Number

Authors

  • Mohd Akmal Masud Faculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 84600 Panchor, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Zamani Ngali Faculty of Manufacturing and Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Batu Pahat Johor, Malaysia
  • Siti Amira Othman Faculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 84600 Panchor, Johor, Malaysia
  • Ishkrizat Taib Faculty of Manufacturing and Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Batu Pahat Johor, Malaysia
  • Kahar Osman Faculty of Biosciences and Medical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Salihatun Md Salleh Faculty of Manufacturing and Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Batu Pahat Johor, Malaysia
  • Ahmad Zahran Md. Khudzari Faculty of Biosciences and Medical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Nor Salita Ali Nuclear Medicine Department, National Cancer Institute, 62250 Putrajaya, Malaysia
  • Anucha Chaichana Faculty of Medical Technology, Department of Radiological Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700 Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.33.2.5566

Keywords:

SPECT, Astonish, OSEM

Abstract

Iterative reconstruction on Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) imaging has recently been commercially available, resulting in reconstructed images with lower noise levels and better spatial resolution. The reconstruction variables employed and chosen under these suggestions include post-filtering, as well as several iterations and subset numbers. However, most of the number of iterations and subsets will give distortion to the segmentation image on a volume to be segmented. For this purpose, this paper will compare the effect of distortion on the dice similarity coefficient of volume segmentation for the iterative reconstruction setting by default as practice. The best outcome with the smallest root-mean-square deviation, highest percentage contrast values, and highest dice similarity coefficient) for all iterations and subsets is in iteration 6 subset 16. Here, the root-mean-square deviation is 8.06. Moreover, the four most enormous spheres can be calculated from the six spheres filled. The best contrast percentage is in subset 32, but the background variability for that subset is exceptionally high, which is 64.5. With post-filtering implementation, the scatter-corrected slices show the most enhanced image resolution and contrast when using advanced Astonish reconstruction algorithms. The user must decide if noise reduction via post-filtering or increased image resolution is more suitable for a certain imaging process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mohd Akmal Masud, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 84600 Panchor, Johor, Malaysia

mohdakmalmasud@gmail.com

Mohd Zamani Ngali, Faculty of Manufacturing and Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Batu Pahat Johor, Malaysia

zamani@uthm.edu.my

Siti Amira Othman, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 84600 Panchor, Johor, Malaysia

sitiamira@uthm.edu.my

Ishkrizat Taib, Faculty of Manufacturing and Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Batu Pahat Johor, Malaysia

iszat@uthm.edu.my

Kahar Osman, Faculty of Biosciences and Medical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

kaharosman@utm.my

Salihatun Md Salleh, Faculty of Manufacturing and Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Batu Pahat Johor, Malaysia

saliha@uthm.edu.my

Ahmad Zahran Md. Khudzari, Faculty of Biosciences and Medical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

zahran.kl@utm.my

Nor Salita Ali, Nuclear Medicine Department, National Cancer Institute, 62250 Putrajaya, Malaysia

drsalita@nci.gov.my

Anucha Chaichana, Faculty of Medical Technology, Department of Radiological Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700 Thailand

anucha.cha@mahidol.edu

Published

2023-11-01

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)