An Analysis of Urban Vehicle Body Aerodynamics Using Computational Fluid Dynamics for the Shell Eco-Marathon Challenge

Authors

  • Harris Fadzillah Zainal Abidin Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • Md Tasyrif Abdul Rahman Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • Abdul Hamid Adom Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • Mohd Ridzuan Mohd Jamir Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • Sufi Suraya Halim Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • Mohd Al Hafiz Mohd Nawi Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.30.2.7591

Keywords:

Aerodynamics, urban vehicle, shell eco marathon, bodywork, computational fluid dynamics, fuel efficiency

Abstract

The Shell Eco-Marathon challenge is an annual competition held to challenge students in innovating the most fuel efficiency vehicle for either a prototype or an urban concept vehicle. An urban concept vehicle is designed for fuel efficiency using electricity as source of power. Apart from the use of electricity as an alternative to internal combustion engines, the design of the vehicle is also crucial for efficiency. The car bodywork design needs to be aerodynamically designed to minimise drag and subsequently use less energy to move. The design must also incorporate structural integrity to protect the driver as well as providing airflow for sufficient ventilation both inside the passenger and the engine compartment. Five models for the rear and front designs were produced using CATIA and analysed using Computational Fluid Dynamics in ANSYS Fluent. The models underwent a virtual wind tunnel on three different air velocity speeds, 20 km/h, 30 km/h and 40 km/h to generate a force report of drag force and coefficient on each design. The front design is chosen based on the lowest drag coefficient and force while the rear design is selected based on a balanced downforce while achieving the lowest practical drag force. The results demonstrated that the air resistance faced by a car was highly influenced by both front and rear design of the body.

Author Biographies

Harris Fadzillah Zainal Abidin, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia

harrisfadzillah97@gmail.com

Md Tasyrif Abdul Rahman, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia

tasyrif@unimap.edu.my

Abdul Hamid Adom, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia

abdhamid@unimap.edu.my

Mohd Ridzuan Mohd Jamir, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia

ridzuanjamir@unimap.edu.my

Sufi Suraya Halim, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia

s181110838@studentmail.unimap.edu.my

Mohd Al Hafiz Mohd Nawi, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia

alhafiznawi@unimap.edu.my

Downloads

Published

2023-04-10

How to Cite

Harris Fadzillah Zainal Abidin, Md Tasyrif Abdul Rahman, Abdul Hamid Adom, Mohd Ridzuan Mohd Jamir, Sufi Suraya Halim, & Mohd Al Hafiz Mohd Nawi. (2023). An Analysis of Urban Vehicle Body Aerodynamics Using Computational Fluid Dynamics for the Shell Eco-Marathon Challenge. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 30(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.30.2.7591

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)