Comparison of Basic Iterative Methods Used to Solve of Heat and Fluid Flow Problems

Authors

  • Abdulbaset S Alkrbash Mechanical and Industrial Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zawia, Libya
  • Alhadi A Abosbaia Mechanical and Industrial Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zawia, Libya
  • Abdulhafid M Elfaghi Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, 86400 Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.101.1.186191

Keywords:

Iterative methods, heat and flow, CFD, ADI, SOR

Abstract

In this research, a comparison of the convergence rate of different basic methods is made in order to solve the Poisson equation, which is similar to some of the resulting equations in computational fluid mechanics. The Jacobi method, the point Gauss-Seidel method, the successive over-relaxation method (SOR), the line Gauss method (TDMA), the ADI method and Strongly Implicit (SIP) method are among the iterative approaches investigated, which are then compared to find the most optimal method. The selection criteria included the number of iterations and the time needed to reach convergence. In both selection criteria, the SIP approach has been shown to be the most efficient.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Abdulbaset S Alkrbash , Mechanical and Industrial Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zawia, Libya

baset.krbash90@gmail.com

Alhadi A Abosbaia, Mechanical and Industrial Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Zawia, Libya

drabosbaia@zu.edu.ly

Abdulhafid M Elfaghi, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, 86400 Johor, Malaysia

abdulhafid@uthm.edu.my

Downloads

Published

2023-01-15

How to Cite

Alkrbash , A. S. ., Abosbaia, A. A. . ., & Abdulhafid M Elfaghi. (2023). Comparison of Basic Iterative Methods Used to Solve of Heat and Fluid Flow Problems. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 101(1), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.101.1.186191

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)